No sourced entries have been published yet. Entries appear here only once tied to a document, dated correspondence, a vote record, or a public statement.
Contributions coded to the healthcare / health-services sector, per the cited sources (FollowTheMoney.org / OpenSecrets; the Arizona Secretary of State portal does not code donors by industry). Figures are the itemized ($200+) contributions the source coded to the health sector, shown per election cycle with the cycle labeled on each line; the total sums the cycles shown. OpenSecrets/FollowTheMoney only code itemized gifts, and Arizona’s Clean Elections public financing means many legislators show little or none — a small figure, or none, is itself part of the record, and where we checked and found none we say so.
accountability & access to care — how we grade
Grade: B+. The committee’s standout on accountability: as chair she led 2026 oversight hearings into AHCCCS’s failures and sponsored a reform package — restructuring the American Indian Health Program (SB1611), requiring qualified clinician review before behavioral-health denials (SB1116), and funding patient-brokering investigations (SB1114) — plus access measures like glucose-monitor coverage. A 72-hour facility “cure period” (SB1233) is a mild industry-relief note in an otherwise oversight-focused record. No health-sector money identified. Graded on sponsorship; roll-call votes weren’t available.
Public officials answer to the public. These are their official public contact channels — we don’t publish personal addresses. Be factual and civil; a specific, sourced concern lands harder than anger.
Find them in the Senate roster — the email column links straight to their azleg.gov address.
Documented entries cite a source you can check. The assessment block, where present, is clearly-labeled opinion and fair comment on a public official's public conduct. See our methodology.